@david_chisnall as far as I remember Firefox also bundles an LLM with the install (useful at least for in browser translations) but it still manages to keep the size reasonable...
marius
@mariusor@metalhead.club
Mostly a programmer.
Implementing #ActivityPub in the #Go programming language.
Current projects:
* #GoActivityPub - a library to use ActivityPub in Go.
* #FedBOX - a generic ActivityPub service supporting the client to server API.
* #brutalinks - a link aggregator inspired by (old) reddit, hacker news and lobste.rs built on top of FedBOX.
* #oni - a single user ActivityPub server with minimal fuss.
My posts are mostly related to ActivityPub and web development.
Posts
Latest notes
No posts yet.
@silverpill lol, based on the "claims" at the begining, why do I feel like the "thanks" at the end should be in quotations?
Also I take umbrage with calling what I've been doing for the past 8 years as "being not difficult to build nor an interesting concept". I feel like, you and other developers having the benefit of dynamically typed programming languages, underestimate how that can be worked into robust APIs when you're limited by less versatile stacks.
@silverpill I think you're getting confused about ActivityPub side-effects and application logic side-effects.
I call my project FedBOX a "Generic ActivityPub server" because outside of storing ActivityPub objects and activities to a local storage and dispatching said activities to their recipients it doesn't do anything else.
However there's nothing preventing someone from forking the project and adding some other type of logic to it for specific combinations of Activities/Objects. That's the thing I'm trying to do with my GoActivityPub library: take care of the ActivityPub stuff, so you can then do your own stuff alongside it.