Egregoros

@NonPlayableClown @sensei @dj @Sternritter-C @s8n @Cozylifer @Wiz

> underage marriage is considered based right?
> That's not considered pedophilia, it's just trolling

I said what I said last time. I have nothing new to say about it.

But hey, s8n is in this thread: he's one of the few people that is still on fedi but actually posted nude preteen girls at me "because it's on Amazon" after spending several days complaining to me about FSE's ban of an account that posted nude preteen girls, and has literally told someone on the openly "MAP/AAM-friendly" server lolison.top to impregnate their "lgf". Was it trolling when he did those things, or was it "based"? Are we going to be consistent about this or what? Is this a "There are no bad tactics, only bad targets" thing? Here's the screenshot of one of those things, I did not take a screenshot of the (again, fully nude, tits out, preteen girls) other post. Like, you care about this, why would it apply to this guy and not s8n?
spag_claims_to_have_14yo_gf.png

@Sui @NonPlayableClown @Sternritter-C @dj @s8n @Cozylifer @Wiz @sensei Well, I've been asked, so I'm responding. I said what I said last time and no new information has arrived so I have no new information. Armstrong is mild compared to s8n, because Armstrong has not, to my knowledge, posted topless underage girls. I don't know why the fuck I'm tagged in here and it's goddamn annoying. When Armstrong posts topless 12-year-olds, complains for days on end when I ban a pedophile that posted topless 12-year-olds, and starts encouraging pedophiles to impregnate underage girls, then I'll remove him from the server, as I did with s8n. Until then, I don't know why anyone would be asking me.

So, anyone that has any questions about Armstrong can answer my questions about s8n first.

> poll

There was no "stop tagging me to ask me to denounce people or I will go full Pinochet" option.

On the plus side, looks like a good thread is coming, per the chart:
thread_cycle.png

I have no idea about the context past npc giving you shit for not moderating one of your users for being a pedo tbh. I can say that since I've followed s8n (back in the early chud days, think it was bot who let us know that he was getting mislabelled a pedo so we had a poll and gave him a chance) he hasn't posted anything even close to armstein's average post. I like him and I've defended him because I haven't seen a reason not to.

> and starts encouraging pedophiles to impregnate underage girls

Ok I've got to stop you there, if he isn't projecting and calling other users a jew that's all he ever fucking does. It's all "rape kids to save the white race" since the first conversation I had with him, and no it isn't just a larp or a troll he's been consistently doing it since his gab days. He told me he wanted to die on the hill of raping kids, so I say let him. If pedos like wiz want to host him they can have him, we defederated them anyway lmoa, but I wouldn't try and defend his honour or integrity as armstein has neither. He just wants pedos to rape kids, and if you don't then you're a jew. Because apparently jews are the only ones who dislike kids getting raped somehow.

> :pinochetsmile: There was no "stop tagging me to ask me to denounce people or I will go full Pinochet" option. :attackhelicopter:

I'm always going to side with my fellow attack helicopters, too many need the work, but you can consider nigger to cover that if you prefer lmao

@Sui @Sternritter-C @dj @s8n @NonPlayableClown @Cozylifer @Wiz @sensei

> I have no idea about the context past npc giving you shit for not moderating one of your users for being a pedo tbh.

You sound like you've got opinions despite having no idea. I declared a long time back that my only explanation for moderation decisions will be to post the GIF and I'm done explaining myself to people that do not use this server. I humor people too much, apparently, because I keep getting asked. In this case, at least, I am not explaining *again* and I'm not changing my mind until I hear new information. People needling me about it means I will probably not ever ban him even if he does some shit that I would have banned him for, just to piss people off.

> Ok I've got to stop you there, if he isn't projecting and calling other users a jew that's all he ever fucking does.

I thought you were talking about s8n for a minute. Are we applying the same standard?

> It's all "rape kids to save the white race"

Legally, this is distinct because it is general and is not directed at a specific pedophile that has a specific 14-year-old girl.

> He told me he wanted to die on the hill of raping kids, so I say let him.

Then you can charge the hill, you know, I don't give a shit what he does. He did say in that screenshot that he wants to die on the "women are property" hill, not the "fuck children" hill, but it doesn't matter either way.

If he's been on this since Gab and he still hasn't posted any naked children, then he is ahead of s8n. Anyone with questions or complaints about what I do with Armstrong can answer what they're going to do with s8n first.